# Understanding Plane Stress Analyzing solid mechanics problems in
three dimensions can be really hard work, and it can get very complicated very
fast. Fortunately in a lot of cases there are some simplifications we can use to
reduce a three-dimensional problem to a two dimensional, one making it much
easier to solve. The two main simplifications which are frequently used in solid mechanics are the plane stress and plane strain conditions. In this video we’re going to take a look at plane stress. So what does plane stress
mean? A component is said to be in a condition of plane stress when all the stress is acting on it are in the same plane. A surprising number of common engineering problems can be approximated
to plane stress conditions. It is most relevant for the analysis of thin components. Let’s take a look at an example. To determine whether we could model this perforated plate using plane stress assumptions, we need to see
whether it is reasonable to assume that all stresses are acting in the same
plane. All the loads are applied in the same plane,
the X-Y plane, so that’s a good
start. But having all loads acting in the same plane is not enough for the plane
stress condition to be met, as we could still have stresses in the Z direction. This is where the thickness of the plate comes into it. We know that normal and
shear stresses at a free surface are always zero.
This means that the stresses on the top and bottom faces of the plate must be zero. And because this plate is
very thin there can’t be much variation in stress through the plate’s thickness, meaning that the stresses in the Z direction will be close to zero all the way through the plate. Because the only non-zero stresses are acting in the X-Y plane, a condition of plane stress applies. Of course in reality the
stresses in the Z direction are unlikely to be exactly zero. Deciding whether a plane stress condition is applicable will always require a degree of engineering judgment. Why is the plane stress assumption useful? We can answer by taking a look at a stress element in our perforated plate. The stresses at a single point are
defined by six different stress components, three normal stresses and
three shear stresses. For plane stress conditions,
sigma-Z, tau-XZ and tau-YZ are equal to zero This means that the six components
defining the stress at a point are reduced to just three components –
sigma-X, sigma-Y and tau-XY. This is a two-dimensional problem which will be much easier to solve. The stress tensor for a three-dimensional case
is a 3×3 matrix. But if we consider plane stress conditions, it is reduced to a much more manageable 2×2 matrix. Let’s look at two more examples of
situations where it might be appropriate to assume plane stress conditions. Pressure vessels can sometimes be modeled using plane stress assumptions. The pressure load generates hoop
stresses which are oriented around the circumference of the vessel,
and axial stresses. If the vessel wall is thin compared to its diameter, radial stresses will be close to zero, and plane stress conditions will be applicable. The teeth of a spur gear can also sometimes be modeled using plane stress conditions, if
the width of the gear is narrow enough. So, to summarize, plane stress is a
simplification which can be used to turn a three-dimensional solid mechanics
problem into a simpler two-dimensional one, by assuming that the stresses in one
direction are equal to zero. It is normally applicable for thin structures
which are loaded in a single plane. Thanks for watching, and stay tuned for
more engineering videos!

## 12 comments on “Understanding Plane Stress”

1. Feynstein 100 Post author

Awesome video. Wish it were longer like the rest tho ?

2. Alek Dincoff Post author

The animation is absolutely great.

3. Ramvel Selvarajan Post author

The video is marvelous
And pls do for stress strain curve

4. Sunchit Anand Post author

Great, fresh content. Also amazing animations! Where did you learn animation? Can you direct me to the resource?

5. Prashant Sinha Post author

Great work

6. Shivam Rai Post author

Amazing

7. dinesh cute Post author

8. Bart Koning Post author

Hi. Thanks doe the geest video. Do you have any sources of this subject? I need it for a scool project, thanks!

9. MOHA KHALAF Post author

Thanks (:

10. Bradley Pring Post author

Great video, loved it!

I think you meant 3×3 matrix at 2:47.

11. Ajay rajendran Post author

Short and understandable ❤️❤️ Thank you

12. Louis Liu Post author

Why can’t uni professors teach like this?